Conversion Algorithm for 3D Visualization of Material Grids of Zeolite Structures from ZeoGAN

Statistics Honors Senior Thesis

Department of Statistics, Northwestern University

First Reader: Dr. Arend Kuyper

Second Reader: Dr. Stephan Irle

Figure 1: Zeolite Structure of RHO, powered by OVITO.

This research is conducted in collaboration with the AI Initiative in the Department of Computational Chemistry and Nanomaterials Sciences at Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Abstract

[add later on]

Blanchard, A. E., Shekar, M. C., Gao, S., Gounley, J., Lyngaas, I., Glaser, J., & Bhowmik, D. (2022). Automating Genetic Algorithm Mutations for Molecules Using a Masked Language Model. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 26(4), 793–799. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2022.3144045

Chandler, D. L. (2022). A dirt-cheap solution? Common clay materials may help curb methane emissions. 1.

Fuhr, A. S., & Sumpter, B. G. (2022). Deep Generative Models for Materials Discovery and Machine Learning-Accelerated Innovation. Frontiers in Materials, 9, 865270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.865270

Jordan, R. (2019). Stanford researchers outline vision for profitable climate change solution. 1.

Jordan, R. (2021). Removing methane from the atmosphere. 1.

Kim, B., Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2020a). Inverse design of porous materials using artificial neural networks. Science Advances, 6(1), eaax9324. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax9324

Kim, B., Lee, S., & Kim, J. (2020b). Supplementary Material - Inverse design of porous materials using artificial neural networks. Science Advances, 6(1), eaax9324. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aax9324

Kim, S., Noh, J., Gu, G. H., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Jung, Y. (2020). Generative Adversarial Networks for Crystal Structure Prediction. ACS Central Science, 6(8), 1412–1420. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c00426

Lackner, K. S. (2020). Practical constraints on atmospheric methane removal. Nature Sustainability, 3(5), 357–357. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0496-7

Lee, S., Kim, B., & Kim, J. (n.d.). Supplementary Information. 30.

Lee, S., Kim, B., & Kim, J. (2019). Predicting performance limits of methane gas storage in zeolites with an artificial neural network. Journal of Materials Chemistry A, 7(6), 2709–2716. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA12208C

Lee, S.-Y., & Holder, G. D. (2001). Methane hydrates potential as a future energy source. Fuel Processing Technology, 71(1-3), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3820(01)00145-X

Lupo Pasini, M., Zhang, P., Temple Reeve, S., & Youl Choi, J. (2022). Multi-task graph neural networks for simultaneous prediction of global and atomic properties in ferromagnetic systems \(^{\textrm{*}}\). Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 3(2), 025007. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ac6a51

Schriider, K.-P., Sauer, J., Leslie, M., Catlow, C. R. A., & Thomas, J. M. (1992). Bridging hydroxyl groups in zeolitic catalysts: A computer simulation of their structure, vibrational properties and acidity in protonated faujasites (H-Y zeolites). CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 188(3), 6.

Yoon, J. (2017). The Benefits and Downsides of Methane. 1.